default header

Theory

The hobag thread

Moderator: JC Denton

Unread postby icycalm » 17 Aug 2009 17:29

Thank you. All I really need is a couple of readers like you and I am happy. It would anyway be unreasonable to ask for many more than that. And you are correct in every last word you wrote.
User avatar
icycalm
Hyperborean
 
Joined: 28 Mar 2006 00:08
Location: Tenerife, Canary Islands

Unread postby Run.Forrest » 18 Aug 2009 15:53

In the Espgaluda II thread on the games subforum, Icy mentioned "a Japanese girl who managed to clear both loops [of Progear no Arashi] after several years of practice." It seemed worth mentioning here that a Japanese girl managed to succeed at a male activity (playing videogames). If videogame reviewing is also a male activity, then Clare Edgely managed to do this as well. At a glance, these facts are hardly disturbing. Women are now succeeding everywhere in the domains of men, aren't they?

But if gender distinction has any meaning, males must be better than females at performing male activities. After all, if females can perform as well as males in a so-called male activity, it must not actually be a male activity. And if females can excel equally to males in all male activities, and the reverse is true, then what remains of the difference between male and female?

Imagine war technology that allows a woman to wage war every bit as well as a man does, and childbirthing/childrearing technology that allows a man to birth and nurture offspring every bit as well as a woman does. Can homosexuality be the technology of "attracting and securing a powerful man?" If men and women can and will be equally good at all things, then what is the point of any gender distinction at all, except to have "variety" in the human species? I suppose all this indicates a debasement of instinct.

The solution here seems to be that we need to distinguish among males, certain types and degrees of men, and distinguish among females, certain types and degrees of women. It did, after all, take the Japanese girl several years of practice to clear Progear no Arashi. How many men have done better?
Run.Forrest
 
Joined: 18 Aug 2009 13:50

Unread postby To The East » 18 Aug 2009 17:48

Run.Forrest wrote: It seemed worth mentioning here that a Japanese girl managed to succeed at a male activity (playing videogames). If videogame reviewing is also a male activity, then Clare Edgely managed to do this as well... Women are now succeeding everywhere in the domains of men, aren't they?


Yes they certainly are thanks to the efforts of the socialists (ie. slave/christian moralists) to turn women into men over the last 200 years. Your arugment was already discussed and examined by Nietzsche himself:

Nietzsche wrote: In the three or four civilized countries of Europe women can through a few centuries of education be made into anything, even into men: not in the sexual sense, to be sure, but in every other sense. Under such a regimen they will one day have acquired all the male strengths and virtues, though they will also of course have had to accept all their weaknesses and vices into the bargain: thus much can, as aforesaid, be extorted.


So yes women can preform male tasks, but why would you want them to? Icy praises Edgely yes, but if she was male would he bother? Her manliness comes at the cost of her weakness (she is a woman). Would it not be better for her to continue doing her womanly tasks and for men to continue videogame journalism?

As for the rest of your post it can be summed up as "but male and female aren't black and white, they are shades of grey". This is obviously correct, you are making no point here, everyone knows this. It is the 'message' of almost every fucking book and movie these days. It was repeated over and over by both Nietzsche and Icy, so why bother saying it again?

I am not sure what your post is saying to be honest. YOU would be wise to read all of the essays on this site before posting in the theory section like this.
"We Must Dissent" - Sister Miriam Godwinson
To The East
 
Joined: 22 Jan 2009 03:16

Unread postby JoshF » 18 Aug 2009 17:57

How do you excel equally?

To The (Middle?) East wrote:Yes they certainly are thanks to the efforts of the socialists (ie. slave/christian moralists) to turn women into men over the last 200 years.
By letting them do things they want to do? You're missing the point of civil rights, which is to remove social barriers not biological ones.
User avatar
JoshF
 
Joined: 14 Oct 2007 14:56

Unread postby To The East » 18 Aug 2009 18:33

I am afraid I do not understand your first question, so I can't try to answer it.

Nietzsche wrote: even into men: not in the sexual sense, to be sure, but in every other sense.


What you have said is exactly what I meant. Removing 'social barriers' is a euphemism for turning women into men.

Virginia Woolf and other feminists have often complained that language itself is so male dominated that it is impossible for women to communicate their true passions and emotions with each other. Thanks to civil rights, women's liberation, and the sexual revolution; women can now participate in all the previously male dominated activities of art, philosophy, science, etc. They still lack their own language and passions though. How can the sexual revolution have freed women when at best it fufills the MALE desire to fuck many beautiful women without the consquence of children?

Women can not "do what they want to do". Women can only do what men want to do.
"We Must Dissent" - Sister Miriam Godwinson
To The East
 
Joined: 22 Jan 2009 03:16

Unread postby icycalm » 18 Aug 2009 19:01

Run.Forrest wrote:It seemed worth mentioning here that a Japanese girl managed to succeed at a male activity (playing videogames).


You don't understand what "male" and "female" stands for in Nietzsche's and my context. There have been plenty of females in the past who were more male than many males, and lord knows there have been countless males who were more female than actual females. Masculinity and femininity go much further than shallow people like you (who only really care about genitals) think they do. And so you found one girl -- or ten -- who can be as good at wiggling a stick as many males. Whoop-de-do! What does that prove? That every rule has some exceptions? That perhaps that girl was not that girly in the first place?

Pedants are so fucking tiresome.

Run.Forrest wrote:Women are now succeeding everywhere in the domains of men, aren't they?


Women are not "succeeding" in anything other than childbearing, same as always. In philosophy, they have not yet written a single sentence worth reading. In sports, they suck so bad that WE HAD TO INVENT SEPARATE CATEGORIES FOR THEM TO COMPETE IN, LOL, OTHERWISE THEY'D NEVER MANAGE TO "WIN" ANYTHING. In art, literature and the rest they still hardly ever manage to get past the most repellent shallowness. So yeah.

Run.Forrest wrote:But if gender distinction has any meaning, males must be better than females at performing male activities.


IF it has any meaning, lol. That it HAS meaning is obvious to anyone who has eyes -- it is not a matter to be disputed or discussed outside of schools for "special" children.

Run.Forrest wrote:After all, if females can perform as well as males in a so-called male activity, it must not actually be a male activity.


But they can't, as I explained, so there's no point in worrying about it.

Run.Forrest wrote:then what remains of the difference between male and female?


Everything remains of it -- to anyone with eyes and half a brain. People like you, on the other hand, are welcome to dispute the existence of sexes and to masturbate yourself out of the human species as you wish.

Run.Forrest wrote:Imagine war technology that allows a woman to wage war every bit as well as a man does


Impossible. Waging war takes far more than machines -- it takes first and above all the WILL to wage war, to declare war, to open hostilities, to ATTACK -- and in that man will always be far superior to woman.

Run.Forrest wrote:and childbirthing/childrearing technology


Once this technology becomes available, if it ever becomes available, we will indeed be very close to... something new. This future development, however, has absolutely no bearing to all the past and contemporary events which we are currently analyzing.

Run.Forrest wrote:Can homosexuality be the technology of "attracting and securing a powerful man?"


For what purpose? So that the two males can sodomize themselves out of the human species? That is where homosexuality leads to: a dead end, oblivion, annihilation for the entire species.

Run.Forrest wrote:If men and women can and will be equally good at all things


In your happy-pretend land of love and equality, maybe. In the real world, however: lol.

Run.Forrest wrote:then what is the point of any gender distinction at all


None. There is no point. Just relax and enjoy playing Godhand.

Run.Forrest wrote:except to have "variety" in the human species?


Corrected version: EXCEPT TO HAVE A HUMAN SPECIES AT ALL!

Run.Forrest wrote:I suppose all this indicates a debasement of instinct.


Perish the thought.

Run.Forrest wrote:The solution here seems to be that we need to


The solution is for you to stop posting in this thread, and perhaps also in this forum, so as not to clog my threads with your shallow, idiotic blabber. So please just stop. Here's a forum where I think you'd feel a lot more comfortable:

http://gaygamer.net/forum/
User avatar
icycalm
Hyperborean
 
Joined: 28 Mar 2006 00:08
Location: Tenerife, Canary Islands

Unread postby icycalm » 18 Aug 2009 19:58

JoshF wrote:How do you excel equally?


This question, by the way, demolishes that dude's shallow ravings by itself. For the dispute here is between entire sexes: not between specific single representatives of them. To say, for example, that men and women "excel equally" at sports, or at videogames, or at philosophy, or at anything whatever, you'd need to provide statistical evidence that showed equality at the level of sexes -- not at the level of individuals, which is what the idiots always attempt. I can find you a big fat woman, for example, who can beat the crap out of a small army of skinny emo teenagers: but what does that prove? SHE may excel the emo skinny teenagers at fighting, whilst her SEX clearly does not excel THE SEX of the emo teenagers at it.

At any rate, the case of the feminists is hopeless even at the level of individuals. The Espgaluda II girl, for example, simply mastered a game which many guys have managed to master -- and THEY have mastered MANY MORE games that she has not. That girl is nowhere near the overall skill level of the top Japanese STG players -- and surprise, surprise: they are all male.

Something else just occurred to me that's flagrantly indicative of woman's complete general incompetence: women do not even excel at cooking. Look up the world's best chefs: they are all male. And even in the lower ranks of that profession -- at the level of the mere cuisiniers -- even that is totally dominated by males.

Read Schopenhauer's essay on the subject -- he has pretty much covered all the angles. Baudrillard too has a great essay on the subject, in "Screened Out", I think. I'll try to find it. His main point is this: we must not attempt to reconcile the sexes, as we must not attempt to reconcile anything. As Nietzsche time and again attempted to explain, the trick is not to demolish differences -- it is to heighten them. That is how strengthening occurs: everything else leads to weakness.
User avatar
icycalm
Hyperborean
 
Joined: 28 Mar 2006 00:08
Location: Tenerife, Canary Islands

Unread postby kingofcrusher » 20 Nov 2009 02:44

I stumbled across Leigh Alexander's Demon's Souls review having never heard of her. She says this right at the beginning:

Though the plot is inscrutable high-fantasy stuff, the game world’s central premise is inventive.


The fact that she finds a very simple plot to be "inscrutable" was my first indication she was retarded. The rest of the review barely makes any sense either.

A friend of mine linked me to your article on her and I thought it was hilarious and beyond reproach.
kingofcrusher
 
Joined: 19 Nov 2009 08:43

Unread postby Choking » 20 Dec 2009 01:24

http://www.girlgamer.com/

A website with shitty design and shitty reviews, now for girls!
Choking
 
Joined: 04 Jun 2009 11:06

Unread postby Worm » 29 Jan 2010 18:35

http://www.infinitelives.net/2010/01/16 ... is-a-girl/

Some girl writes amusingly hyperbolic junk about Portal (emphasis added):
Jenn Frank wrote:You see yourself in your own periphery, in an orange jumpsuit, darting past. It’s terrifying, real uncanny doppelgaenger stuff here.
....
Surprise! You are a chick.

THAT IS UNSETTLING.

It’s unsettling even if you really are a chick, but probably also if you are a dude. Because, when you spatially align yourself so that you can observe your own avatar, she is staring off to her right or left through a space/time vortex, ostensibly gazing right back at you. And (this is the horrific part), you and she are standing in exactly the same spot and moment in space and time, eyeing each other. I don’t think there’s a stranger existential moment in the history of gaming.


Get a grip. Also, a big lol in the comments:

corbenfrost wrote:women traditionally have more lower body strength then men do, one need look no further then the last olympics to see that
User avatar
Worm
 
Joined: 20 Dec 2008 21:06

Unread postby JoshF » 29 Jan 2010 19:20

I think they mean lower center of gravity. It's why She-Ra is stronger than He-Man!
User avatar
JoshF
 
Joined: 14 Oct 2007 14:56

Unread postby icycalm » 30 Jan 2010 13:41

http://www.poe-news.com/forums/sp.php?pi=1002219236

The Head of John the Baptist wrote:if this is true, then how come my girlfriend is better at galaga than i am?


Zatoichi Jones wrote:i'm sure he'd say it has something to do with the amount of dicks she's sucked

he'd also say it in all caps


An interesting hypothesis... It is however refuted by the facts, I am afraid, because otherwise the artfags would be like the best players ever. One then has to draw the opposite conclusion: that sucking cocks is detrimental to game-playing ability... His girlfirend therefore has probably sucked NOT NEARLY ENOUGH COCKS -- perhaps even FEWER than he himself has sucked?...
User avatar
icycalm
Hyperborean
 
Joined: 28 Mar 2006 00:08
Location: Tenerife, Canary Islands

Unread postby Nybble » 30 Mar 2010 17:05

http://twitter.com/leighalexander/status/11313951460

Leigh Alexander wrote:whenever people consult me as an expert on hentai and/or rape games i feel like my parents must be so proud i found my niche :P

LOL. She is a goldmine of great quotes.
Nybble
 
Joined: 06 Jan 2010 02:03

Unread postby icycalm » 18 Apr 2010 13:52

http://www.call-to-adventure.com/?p=704

Street Fighter IV is one of my favorite games of last year, but like all games, it’s becoming embarrassing. I’m an adult with a lifetime of real, painful experiences behind me, and the best the industry can manage is a set of action figures with intricate move-sets. I’m not knocking the pleasures of the game; I absolutely enjoy the psychic chess match of a good round of SFIV. But what am I looking at? What am I engaging? These bikini girls and green monsters, sumo wrestlers and broad cultural stereotypes. Is the announcer’s screams of, “THE STRONG WIN AND THE WEAK LOSE! WHICH FIGHTER WILL PROVE THE OLD AXIOM TODAY!?” supplementing my intelligence? Is Street Fighter enriching my brain? Is it a protein, or is it perhaps, mercury?


YOU ARE PLAYING AN ACTION GAME YOU DUMB FUCKIN' CUNT, IT'S SUPPOSED TO "SUPPLEMENT" YOUR REFLEXES NOT YOUR INTELLIGENCE FOR CHRIST SAKE! JESUS FUCKING CHRIST ALREADY! JUST SHUT UP! SHUT SHUT SHUT YOUR STOOPID LITTLE FUCKING TRAP ALREADY!

FUCK! JESUS FUCKING FUCK ALREADY! WON'T YOU AT LEAST TAKE PITY ON US? CAN WE NOT PERHAPS POOL TOGETHER SOME MONEY AND GIVE IT TO YOU SO THAT YOU CAN STOP SCRIBBLING, AT LEAST FOR A WHILE? WE WILL PAY YOU TO STOP SCRIBBLING YOU IMBECILIC LITTLE CUNT!
User avatar
icycalm
Hyperborean
 
Joined: 28 Mar 2006 00:08
Location: Tenerife, Canary Islands

Unread postby icycalm » 18 Apr 2010 13:58

And of course it goes without saying that she would never ever go ANYWHERE NEAR a game that actually "supplemented" her intelligence -- i.e. a strategy game. The most strategy-containing game I have seen her write about was Final Fantasy XII: Revenant Wings, a pathetic little abortion of an RTS which I thoroughly trashed when it came out:

I wrote:Because this isn't just some half-assed attempt at the RTS genre -- this IS the worst such game you've ever played. How bad exactly is it? It's so bad that even if you try to come up with ways in which it could become worse, most of them will end up making it better. That bad.


http://insomnia.ac/reviews/ds/finalfant ... nantwings/

She fucking loved that shit. And then she asks for games to supplement her intelligence, lol -- games she would be incapable of playing even if someone FORCED HER TO.
User avatar
icycalm
Hyperborean
 
Joined: 28 Mar 2006 00:08
Location: Tenerife, Canary Islands

Unread postby icycalm » 18 Apr 2010 14:03

Aparagus soup is one of my favorite dishes of last year, but like all dishes, it’s becoming embarrassing. I’m an adult with a lifetime of real, painful experiences behind me, and the best the industry can manage is a little soup with intricate ingredients. I’m not knocking the pleasures of the soup; I absolutely enjoy the psychic-sensual involvement of a good portion of asparagus soup. But what am I slurping down? What am I eating? These asparagi and asparagi juices, egg yolks and stereotypical soup ingredients. Is the waiter's screams of, “DINNER HAS BEEN SERVED!” supplementing my intelligence? Is asparagus soup enriching my brain? Is it a protein, or is it perhaps, mercury?


Feel free to make your own stoopid cunt quotes for other "industries".
User avatar
icycalm
Hyperborean
 
Joined: 28 Mar 2006 00:08
Location: Tenerife, Canary Islands

Unread postby abe » 18 Apr 2010 19:34

Famvir is one of my favorite genital herpes medications of last year, but like all genital herpes medications, it’s becoming embarrassing. I’m an adult with a lifetime of real, painful genital herpes experiences behind me, and the best the industry can manage is a temporary solution to my genital herpes. I’m not knocking the relief of the genital herpes medication; I absolutely enjoy the relief of a good genital herpes relief of Famvir. But what am I looking at? What am I engaging? These pills and white and yellow boxes. Is my screams of "OH GOD MAKE IT STOP IT HURTS SO BAD!!!" supplementing my intelligence? Is Famvir enriching my brain? Is it a protein, or is it perhaps, mercury?
abe
 
Joined: 02 Jul 2009 06:19

Unread postby icycalm » 18 Apr 2010 22:14

What this is all about, basically, is a new form, a new strain of nihilism. I call it the "stoopid blonde cunt" form of modern nihilism. Her argument goes basically something like this: "Whatever does not supplement my intelligence is worthless and does not deserve to exist." And since NOTHING can supplement her intelligence, since she was BORN a stoopid blonde cunt and will DIE a stoopid blonde cunt, NOTHING is worthwhile and therefore NOTHING deserves to exist.

Like I said, a particularly modern, particularly virulent form of nihilism. And there's really only one cure for it: Round up all the blonde cunts who have been infected, chain them up, and throw them perhaps as a gift to prison populations.
User avatar
icycalm
Hyperborean
 
Joined: 28 Mar 2006 00:08
Location: Tenerife, Canary Islands

Unread postby aaden » 18 Apr 2010 22:41

Tight Ass Twinks 7 is one of my favorite gay pornos of last year, but like all pornos, it’s becoming embarrassing. I’m an adult with a lifetime of real, painful experiences behind me, and the best the industry can manage is two sweaty guys and a set of intricate sex-toys. I’m not knocking the pleasures of the pornography; I absolutely enjoy the anal soreness of a good round of fisting. But what am I looking at? What am I engaging? These twinks and bears, fetishes and gay stereotypes. Is the bottom’s screams of, “UNNNGHH YEAH BABY FUCK MY SLUTTY ASSHOLE HARDER!” supplementing my intelligence? Is Tight Ass Twinks 7 enriching my brain? Is it a protein, or is it perhaps, mercury?
User avatar
aaden
 
Joined: 04 Jun 2009 20:11

Unread postby icycalm » 19 Apr 2010 00:06

This is what she has basically done:

Heather Campbell wrote:Street Fighter IV is one of my favorite games of last year


She first takes some random game, SFIV in this case, which is not even a decent fighting game to begin with, and calls it one of her "favorite games of last year".

Heather Campbell wrote:and the best the industry can manage is a set of action figures with intricate move-sets.


Then she elevates this sub-par mediocre fighting game which she was led to by her ignorance and bad taste to "THE BEST THE INDUSTRY CAN MANAGE".

Heather Campbell wrote:[is it] supplementing my intelligence? Is Street Fighter enriching my brain? Is it a protein, or is it perhaps, mercury?


Then she blows up the importance of the game to almost metaphysical proportions, by DEMANDING that it "supplement her intelligence", that it "enrich her brain". Whoever suggested to her that if she were really that worried about the level of her intelligence she should perhaps consider studying some philosophy, some history, reading some literature, trying to master a science, going on a trip around the world, throwing herself into adventures, etc. etc., would be met with astonished disbelief, with rage even. "NO, I WANT THIS LITTLE SUB-PAR MEDIOCRE FIGHTING GAME TO ENRICH MY INTELLIGENCE AND I WANT IT TO DO IT NOW. I WANT TO PRESS THESE LITTLE BUTTONS ON THIS CONTROLLER FOR A FEW MINUTES AND TO BECOME AS INTELLIGENT AS MONTAIGNE OR JUNG, AS ELOQUENT AS STENDHAL OR GOGOL, AS KNOWLEDGABLE, WISE, WELL-TRAVELED AND WELL-HEELED AS ANY OTHER HUMAN BEING THAT HAS EVER EXISTED. I DEMAND THAT THIS LITTLE MEDIOCRE FIGHTING GAME DO ALL THIS TO ME, AND IF IT DOESN'T DO IT THEN I WILL BLAME IT ON THE "INDUSTRY" -- ALL THOSE COOL DUDES WHO GREW UP WITH THESE KINDS OF GAMES AND WHO SIMPLY WANT TO KEEP MAKING THEM -- YEAH, I DEMAND THAT THEY STOP AND THAT THEIR EVERY WAKING HOUR FROM NOW ON BE SPENT IN FIGURING OUT WAYS TO MAKE ME THE SUPREME HUMAN BEING THROUGH A FACILE INTERACTION WITH THEIR LITTLE PIECES OF CODE THAT WERE NEVER MEANT AS ANYTHING MORE THAN SHALLOW DISTRACTION."

Like, this is exactly what she is saying -- I am not even exaggerating. And people pay her money to vomit this shit in their magazines, then OTHERS pay money for these magazines, then read her vomit and call her "thoughtful" and "interesting" and "knowledgeable" and shit. In previous eras someone would have simply smacked her in the face before she had had time to finish vomiting even her first sentence, but now our dear contemporaries are raising her up to the status of an intellectual for fuck's sake.

The level of dissolution of Western civilization (which for the past few centuries has been synonymous with human civilization), is simply insane -- unfathomable, almost ungraspable. To attempt to imagine how much worse things can get in the future is to risk madness -- and a level of disgust so powerful it can actually kill you.

So it's either go mad or die of disgust. -- these are the passive options. The active option is to strike back, which is what I've been doing. Hence also the ruthlessness and brutality of my attacks. It's kill or be killed -- and I sure as hell ain't planning on dying. Not anytime soon at least.
User avatar
icycalm
Hyperborean
 
Joined: 28 Mar 2006 00:08
Location: Tenerife, Canary Islands

Unread postby icycalm » 19 Apr 2010 00:45

She was even served by one of her commenters:

madato wrote:Now, to respond to your main argument, that games do not have the attachment of film. All I have to say to that is. You’re a pseudo gamer. A console-only gamer. A casual gamer. A novelty-gamer. A mainstream gamer. You haven’t played competitive games. You haven’t mastered your skills in any game. You’re a couch gamer. You probably haven’t ever pwned someone in counterstrike. And even if you did, you wouldn’t enjoy it. Because you are not a gamer. You will play and then go back to rewatching films. You liked the novelty of games, and it wore off for you. And you are projecting the disappointment to the rest of us gamers.


I wouldn't be surpised if this dude turned out to be an Insomnia reader. He must have at least read the hobag article.
User avatar
icycalm
Hyperborean
 
Joined: 28 Mar 2006 00:08
Location: Tenerife, Canary Islands

Unread postby Amor fati » 20 Apr 2010 16:40

User avatar
Amor fati
 
Joined: 25 Mar 2010 01:36

Unread postby icycalm » 20 Apr 2010 17:01

I watched the first two minutes. I was almost crying from laughter. I will watch the rest later. No need to rent a comedy today.
User avatar
icycalm
Hyperborean
 
Joined: 28 Mar 2006 00:08
Location: Tenerife, Canary Islands

"My Favorite Game Journo"

Unread postby JRGBruno » 06 May 2010 20:41

This is my first post on the Insomnia Forums. My apologies for not formally introducing myself on the site's "Welcome" section before submitting this entry.

In any event, I had to break with site protocol after seeing this tweet from Leigh Alexander. It's such a sad, funny, pathetic, infuriating tweet. There's a "fan portrait" involved, but make sure to read her entire exchange with the toad-faced fanboy who drew it (that's the sad part, which is to say the best part).

Start here, where Leigh announces to the world how honored she is that a fan drew a portrait of her.

https://twitter.com/leighalexander/status/13495866960

For a more complete picture of their exchange, you might want to begin here and work your way back.

https://twitter.com/leighalexander/status/13496358197

And here is her main twitter feed for further reference: https://twitter.com/leighalexander

It's possible that I'm missing parts of it, given how disorganized and confusing Twitter can get (and given the fact that I don't give enough of a shit to spend any more time looking through her feed).
JRGBruno
 
Joined: 03 Feb 2010 23:14
Location: San Juan, PR

Re: "My Favorite Game Journo"

Unread postby icycalm » 06 May 2010 22:54

Funny thing is, you actually follow her Twitter feed on your feed, and answer her posts regularly -- but not this one! No, like the slimy little scumbag that you are, you decided to keep your Twitter feed free from this bile -- bile which would have made your relationship with her (and with her horde of followers, hangers-on, etc.) uncomfortable, to say the least, and instead came on over to MY forum, which, after all, as everyone knows, is the internet's no. 1 bile-repository on videogame-related matters, to vent your petty hatred here. And you don't even like this place! You have not posted anything else in the three months you've been a member, and you even admit that you haven't made up your mind yet if you ever will. All you wanted to do was to find some outlet for your wretched, cowardly hatred!

But perhaps I am mistaken. In that case I have an exercise for you: go to your Twitter feed and answer her post with the following:

"A sad, funny, pathetic, infuriating tweet. (And your fanboy is toad-faced, btw.)"

It'll be a good exercise for you: it will help you discover if you actually have a cock in your pants or a cunt.

And because, let's face it, I already know the answer, I am now going to go ban you.
User avatar
icycalm
Hyperborean
 
Joined: 28 Mar 2006 00:08
Location: Tenerife, Canary Islands

PreviousNext

Return to Theory