default header

Theory

Re: Conventions

Moderator: JC Denton

Re: Conventions

Unread postby icycalm » 29 Apr 2011 03:55

http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbc ... /110309992

Roger Ebert wrote:There is a lazy editing style in action movies these days that assumes nothing need make any sense visually. In a good movie, we understand where the heroes are, and where their opponents are, and why, and when they fire on each other, we understand the geometry. In a mess like this, the frame is filled with flashes and explosions and shots so brief that nothing makes sense. From time to time, there'll be a closeup of Aaron Eckhart screaming something, for example, and on either side of that shot, there will be unrelated shots of incomprehensible action.

When I think of the elegant construction of something like "Gunfight at the OK Corral," I want to rend the hair from my head and weep bitter tears of despair. Generations of filmmakers devoted their lives to perfecting techniques that a director like Jonathan Liebesman is either ignorant of, or indifferent to. Yet he is given millions of dollars to produce this assault on the attention span of a generation.

Young men: If you attend this crap with friends who admire it, tactfully inform them they are idiots. Young women: If your date likes this movie, tell him you've been thinking it over, and you think you should consider spending some time apart.
User avatar
icycalm
Hyperborean
 
Joined: 28 Mar 2006 00:08
Location: Tenerife, Canary Islands

Unread postby Turnus » 23 Aug 2011 17:28

http://blogs.indiewire.com/pressplay/ar ... os_cinema/

Matthias Stork wrote:Rapid editing, close framings, bipolar lens lengths and promiscuous camera movement now define commercial filmmaking. Film scholar David Bordwell gave this type of filmmaking a name: intensified continuity. But Bordwell’s phrase may not go far enough. In many post-millennial releases, we’re not just seeing an intensification of classical technique, but a perversion. Contemporary blockbusters, particularly action movies, trade visual intelligibility for sensory overload, and the result is a film style marked by excess, exaggeration and overindulgence: chaos cinema.
User avatar
Turnus
 
Joined: 10 Mar 2011 16:22
Location: Texas, USA

Unread postby fkndead » 31 Jan 2012 17:00

Came across a cool quote by Emmanuel Lubezki, one of the top cinematographers today:

http://www.theasc.com/ac_magazine/Augus ... /page1.php

“In all the movies I’ve done, I always worked with a set of rules — they help me to find the tone and the style of the film,” he says. “Art is made of constraints. When you don’t have any, you go crazy, because everything is possible.”
fkndead
 
Joined: 29 Nov 2011 01:02


Return to Theory