Wikipedia wrote:The game was reviewed in 1991 in Dragon #166, receiving 6 stars, out of a 5-star system
Which is precisely what I call Videogame Art.
Moderator: JC Denton
by icycalm » 25 May 2012 03:16
Wikipedia wrote:The game was reviewed in 1991 in Dragon #166, receiving 6 stars, out of a 5-star system
by icycalm » 25 May 2012 21:29
I wrote:NOT ART: PONG (1972)
Let's start this by clearing up the number one question doubtless currently in everyone's mind: what's up with all this "Not Art" nonsense? In brief, if "Videogame Art" means "Great Videogames" (as I've already sort-of explained in my "Can Games 'be Art' essay", and more fully elaborated in my Genealogy), then "Not Art" means "Not Great".
by Insomnia » 01 Nov 2018 02:26
icycalm wrote:All other life concerns ceased while I was playing Wing Commander, and the only thing that mattered was my getting to the end.
by Insomnia » 10 Nov 2018 08:56
icycalm wrote:You can tell that no one ever really understood Wing Commander by how feeble all attempts at copying it have been.