Moderator: JC Denton
by Reid » 27 Nov 2006 01:56
by icycalm » 27 Nov 2006 20:49
by Jedah » 04 Dec 2006 11:55
by bullethell » 24 Jan 2007 22:42
by icycalm » 25 Jan 2007 21:22
by Jedah » 26 Jan 2007 11:39
by icycalm » 26 Jan 2007 12:57
by bullethell » 27 Jan 2007 15:10
by icycalm » 03 May 2007 15:16
by Lotekx » 18 Feb 2008 23:00
by raphael » 04 Mar 2008 19:50
by icycalm » 05 Mar 2008 02:17
by icycalm » 07 Mar 2008 02:35
by Admiral.49 » 09 Mar 2008 19:23
by Senfi » 17 Mar 2008 16:14
by icycalm » 17 Mar 2008 16:35
Senfi wrote:Establishing the basics establishes that you give considerable attention to the small part of your audience that attempts to engage you in public debate.
Senfi wrote:Given that you choose to spare no insult to some groups of people in your editorials, you wouldn't expect them to want to do the debate thing very respectfully.
Senfi wrote:I saw in a few other threads that you often take care of that issue by banning them, and do not choose to justify that position since they are idiots and you own the place.
Senfi wrote:I think you are creating a negative feedback loop. You invite harsh attacks, that you will deal with by frequently banning criticism because of its delivery, and that will invite personal attacks.
In the process of fighting this unwinnable war you will alienate your readers, especially the less hardcore you'd like to convince to pick up something different, but will feel like they have been dragged in the middle battle of egos.
Senfi wrote:I enjoyed reading Insomnia for a few months, but the recent articles make me concerned about its future.