https://robertsspaceindustries.com/spec ... -2/6378448JakeAcappella-CIG @JakeAcappella-CIG wrote:Intergalactic Aerospace Expo 2953 - Pledge UpdatesHello everyone,
We've seen a number of you preparing for the upcoming Intergalactic Aerospace Expo, whether it's picking out what ship to pilot during the Free Fly or sorting through your web hangar ships and upgrades. We want to give you a heads-up about some price changes coming to a selection of ships, going into effect with IAE 2953.
Updates: - Anvil F7C-M Super Hornet | $185 (+$5)
- RSI Constellation Taurus | $200 (+$10)
- RSI Constellation Aquila | $315 (+$5)
- Aegis Redeemer | $330 (+$5)
- MISC Hull D | $550 (+$100)
- RSI Orion | $650 (+$75)
Capt_Snuggles @Capt_Snuggles wrote:Jake,
Any chance you're able to advise as to why? Concept ships is one thing, but would be good to understand why existing delivered ships (F7C-M, Aquila etc) that have little/no love in years are getting price hikes.
Crackpunch @Crackpunch wrote:Inflation. The cost to 'make' the ships doesn't go up, but their operating costs certainly do.
Smoker @PuppetMaster86 wrote:Operating costs for digital goods? they don't even use any electricity and simply have to be duplicated :) Only the development and adaptation costs money, but once finished there are no further costs! In addition, you should perhaps simply try to offset the increased salaries and other costs by offering cheaper prices! A $150 ship that will cost $10 more will bring in §160, 2 $150 ships that will cost $20 cheaper will bring in $260, mass makes profit!
Capt_Snuggles @Capt_Snuggles wrote:To be fair, there are so many inaccuracies in this post, I can't correct them all.
The company as a whole has costs every single moment of the day; whether you're talking about the electricity and heating, property, to insurance, licensing. Then your people costs thrown in and all that comes with those - all sat under OpEx. Then your CapEx, with assets, equipment, IP, etc. These costs don't just 'exist' for a single ship's modelling and delivery, and the pledges fund the company, not the ship.
@Crackpunch is most certainly right in that it'll be linked to inflation; salaries, costs and more rise year on year - income needs to match, or else a business will go bust. So the perspective of 'once finished there are no further costs' is incredibly short-sighted.
Regardless, curious to know what's driven the price change in these particular ships, when there are far more questionable ships in regards to the pantheon and their prices that stand out (Cutlass Black, as an example, or the Cutlass Steel on the other end of the spectrum).
dust @dust_cell wrote:They absolutely have operating costs related to maintaining ships, very large ones at that. Code doesn't update itself.
That said, if this were the case I imagine we would have seen more updates here. These seem a bit more intentional than just covering operating costs - I wonder if they're designed to make space, position them more accurately, or to break specific CC chains.
knsmknd @Han-Kelrian wrote:It was always said that ships will increase in price over time.
Carth Antex @CarthAntex wrote:The explanation they already made years ago. How further the project goes, prices for ships will increase - that's nothing new and surprising. That's why it is recommended to buy them now and concept ships before their release.
Wren @hrafnblod wrote:"We're going to make these announcements with more advance notice so y'all can have a chance to buy things before the price hike" - CIG in June the last time they arbitrarily raised prices on ships they added no new value to. What happened to that?
Jack 'Zero' Owens @JackZero wrote:Yes, it would be fair if CIG would at least offer those ships until the IAE starts for the old price. For the Orion and Hull D, I expect we'll see WB CCUs for the old price, so the issue isn't that bad! But those small increases where a WB CCU won't fit really hurt!
Larszx @Wykhom wrote:Why even bother telling us in advance about the Super Hornet and Redeemer. We can't do anything about it.
VerseGen @Verse_Gen wrote:Orion, too.
Mrax @Mrax wrote:If you have a CCU in buyback you can get it for the old price right now.
Admiral_Deckard @Admiral_Deckard wrote:Just be happy they are in fact giving us advance notice this time and not doing it without saying anything like they did at Invictus this year. I would rather they make these changes before the event than after everyone has already made CCU purchases that they may or may not come to regret like getting a Cutty Black to a Nova Warbond during this summer's Invictus. It ended up not granting any savings at all.
Capt_Snuggles @Capt_Snuggles wrote:In truth, CIG has always said that concept was the cheapest a ship would ever be (excusing the obvious CCU-chaining side of things).
Don't get me wrong - I'm not opposed to price changes at all. But price changes have always come with justification. Caterpillar's features versus the 'rival' C2. Avenger rework. Ships moving from concept to release. It's rare that there are random increases on (seemingly) random ships with no justification/merit, and such an oddball selection/group too.
Vlas @Vlas_vilneous wrote:The only ones that are out of band on price are Orion and Hull D, which are still not released. All others are literally inflationary.
Prices have always been set on concept size, vs actual size. They know, after releasing the Hull C, Hull D will be larger. They also know Orion will be larger, because they are working on it or working on other RSI ships and realizing the conceptual sizes are smaller than what they will put together.