So according to someone who writes for Gamasutra, Leigh Alexander has more interesting things to say about games than I do:
Christian Nutt wrote:hrm. this guy vs. leigh is self-evidently fail. no attention required or deserved.
http://zerochan.livejournal.com/514523.htmlPerhaps if I got a vagina and bigger boobs those nerds would start paying more attention to me?
Also, this:
In the meantime, anyone who actually matters in the games biz will persist in not caring he exists.
This sort of comment is among the reasons I posted the Schopenhauer essays here. No need for explanations -- just copy & paste:
Schopenhauer wrote:But there is another way; and when a man of eminent merit appears, the first effect he produces is often only to pique all his rivals, just as the peacock’s tail offended the birds. This reduces them to a deep silence; and their silence is so unanimous that it savors of preconcertion. Their tongues are all paralyzed. It is the silentium livoris described by Seneca. This malicious silence, which is technically known as ignoring, may for a long time interfere with the growth of reputation; if, as happens in the higher walks of learning, where a man’s immediate audience is wholly composed of rival workers and professed students, who then form the channel of his fame, the greater public is obliged to use its suffrage without being able to examine the matter for itself.
http://insomnia.ac/essays/on_reputation/Also!
Back in the InsertCredit days, it was debated whether Icy was real, or some persona adopted for shock value/trolling/low entertainment/whatever. In the end, it didn't really matter, because the results were the same.
The last sentence is actually a very insightful observation.